I could not believe this article.  Well, actually, I can believe it.  I find the media incredibly unforgiving and the pieces that we read are often so twisted, you never know what to think.  Or, more to the point, what the meaning behind a story could possibly be.

Take, for example, this article on Mischa Barton.  She has been photographed because she is wearing a tight pair of leather pants.  And, apparently, the authors believe that she made a VERY BAD decision to step out of her house dressed like this.  I mean, really Mischa- how DARE you show a curve?  Squeeze into pants?  Obviously, as you are 5'10 and a size 6/8, there is no reason why any of us, the PUBLIC, should be forced to watch you walk across the street wearing clothes that show your figure.  RIGHT?  Please.

As a curvy size 12, she is ridiculed for having cellulite on her legs.. then she slims down to a "gaunt size 6."  She then gains weight and is now photographed for looking bad in a pair of leather pants, but pictured as a "sartorial clothes horse" when she was smaller than the "gaunt 6."  So should she just stay inside whilst healthy, or perhaps only wear long, flowing dresses that hide her figure, lest someone be forced to look an actual CURVE on an actress? Does this make any sense, to anyone? 

Read the article below


CLICK FOR THE FULL ARTICLE AT THE DAILY MAIL

There was a time when Mischa Barton could throw on any old clothes and the fashion world would follow.

Butspotted out wearing unflattering leather leggings with Conversetrainers and a low-cut white blouse, the actress looked nothing likeher normal stylish self.

The 23-year-old squeezed into the tightwet-look trousers as she popped to Le Pain Quotidien restaurant in LosAngeles on Friday